Why should I support pro-White sentiments?  [This article was posted by me in ukresident. com around the year 2004]

I won’t.

But there seems to be so many confused understandings of terms like White, Asian, Black, Brown, Hindu, Muslim etc

But the subject of this post may not have anything to do with this theme, but a connection may be discerned.

What Britain and even almost all-English nations need is a very intelligent immigration policy, which takes into account long-term implications of each and every action and inaction. One, which can intelligently visualise the changes, this can perch on a lot of social themes. Everyone seems to be having a very happy time debating on this theme, with not many of them keen on keeping sight of what is required.

What is required is the continuation of the political entity called Britain, and all that it represents. First of all, just dump the idea that Britain did exploit the world, for even if Britain did it, the rest of the world is no better. And if Britain did do it, it is just a refection of the insincerity and other negative attributes of the other social systems that allowed a stark outsider to ride roughshod over many of their own brethren.

But, in terms of debating immigration themes, there is much, much that needs to be understood. Starting from the language and other related issues, to the affect of large groups of alien language speaking groups amassing in one particular location or area of work.

The themes of immigration issues need to be dealt with in a mood that doesn’t allow it to be mixed up with other themes like racism, religious issues, colour, and ethnicity. But then, the theme cannot be discussed in isolation from all these items.

Britain is an attractive nation. But then, this attractiveness is not connected to the geography, beauty of the Lake district, nearness to the sea etc. It is the people that make it attractive. Not the colour of the people, mind you; for if it was so, then Russia, and so many other nations are there in Europe that could be equally attractive. Then, is it the Money value? Well, for persons who just arrive for working and then going back, the anomalous exchange rate could be attractive. That does not explain the fact that persons who might be working in a small-time level, mostly like to continue in Britain, despite their chance of being very rich men on their return to their native lands. A rather strange affinity for serving in heaven, than for reigning in Hell!

When I talk about the attractiveness of the British people, again it is not an allowable theme. For, the general refrain is that the English are as cold as a frozen fish, while the same immigrant could get enduring warmth from his own countrymen, by just displaying his ‘England returned’ tag.

Now, why is England attractive, and how long would it remain so, if the English social experiences start becoming non-English. Mind you, a person’s behaviour is not just a projection that comes from his mind, but can also be one that is a reaction to received social signals.

One of the main painful things in this debate would be that maybe one gets disturbed by some social signal from an alien group of persons, or even of one single person. Yet, there would be persons of the same ethnicity who would be very, very likable. Now, once a person makes a common comment of dislike, branding the disturbing group in one bracket, the next thing that comes up would be how would one account the other likeable person/s, who really are most attractive, and seem to be really apart from this group.

Another thing, that needs to be taken for debate is the issue of legal immigrants, as apart from illegal one. Now, I might say something that I should not say. But it has to continue from my mind as a logical continuation of a thinking process. And I, the person, need to be seen apart from what I am saying.

Do the legal immigrants really bring in better social inputs, as different from the illegal ones? Here I am on really dangerous grounds. And do all immigrants bring in vile programs? Or only some? And can the vile programs be understood in isolation to the persons who have it in them. And do these vile programs design their personal attributes, which can range from beautiful to ugly.

Is there something apart from colour, race, ethnicity, religion etc. that remains as a disturbing undercurrent in immigrant population? Another thing to be studied is does the single immigrant person, who lives for a long time in Britain, in isolation from his native people show any change in social features? And do the ethnic population which moves in bigger groups tend to retain their native features? It may safely be understood that they would not be able to bear their native social systems, once they come and stay in Britain for sometime. (Exceptions are there) Even though they may harp on the antique superiority of their native lands.

There are so many understandings that should come into the policy makers mind, that, I am afraid I must say with the courage that only my convictions can lend, has not come into standard text books on Sociology, Political Science, Human Psychology etc.

Just to input a theme: Once I did attend a lecture given by one Oxford returned, (Tamil descent), professor of Management and Communication studies. He was speaking on the theme of Transactional Analysis of human personality, as defined as of Child, Adult and Parent, with each of them rearranging themselves in various hues and shades in a person’s personality. He was parroting on very familiar tracks. But, what I was shocked was that his dissertations did not at all take into consideration of what was the contortion this theory would have to bear when enlarged on the feudal language communication systems. And, actually this was the reality that he was very much living in. 

So much for theory, and its connections to reality!