Leading the Anglosphere

Now, let me very clearly mention how the English nations should arrange themselves. Which nation should lead the Anglo-sphere? Well, to say that is it is America’s prerogative to do so, is in itself an illustration of how much the English standards of the US have been compromised. In feudal languages, the higher indicant is reserved for the big, the huge, and the powerful, and to the rude and the crude. However, in English there is no such concept of indicant words. Hence, big, huge, powerful etc. do not mean much. What has real value in English is refinement, antiquity of refinement, excellence, standards, maintenance of standards, quality heritage, legacy of worthy literature, excellent personages, history of standing for the right, fighting against human enslavement and such things. And also a very powerful and enduring structure of identifiable elements of national sovereignty. Well, only Britain can claim all this. The US, by its very wayward behaviour of disrupting all established standards has proved itself a non-trustworthy entity to lead.

SEE this counter comment against me on Scientific American

QUOTE: Comment attacking my comments in Ramanujam page on SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

Neeraj in reply to VED from VICTORIA INSTITUTIONS 03:14 PM 12/22/12

India has produced brilliant scientists, astronomers and mathematicians from time immemorial, none of them needed the help of a tiny island to get their voice out into the world

MY COMMENT HERE: See the words ‘tiny island’. Actually the commenter is focusing on the geographical size of a quality nation. The actual fact is that neither this whole nation nor its army marched into Madras to take over the place (Arcot). Actually it was done by Robert Clive who had under him just 20 white soldiers and around 180 committed Tamils. They withstood months of siege by the howling mob controlled by the local Raja and the French.

Even the way it changed the Right-hand driving to Left-hand driving to prove its independence from Britain, really smacks of immaturity. It was immature action, for every nation in the world is endeavouring to do the same things. India wants to establish ‘Indian’ standards. I remember when I was doing a Pharmaceutical manufacturing business, the Drugs department asked me to change my application for a particular drug production. I had used the British Pharmacopeia standards. BP standards are statutorily allowed. However, the officials said that if the drug is mentioned in Indian Pharmacopoeia, then I was to follow the Indian Pharmacopoeia. What would Indian Pharmacopoeia be at that time? A plain plagiarism of BP, with superimposed variations.

The Islamists want to centre everything on Mecca, even the International Date Line. Russians want to bring about their own systems. They made a mess of so many scientific nomenclatures by trying to give different names even to Elements in chemistry. Everyone knows about their ‘cosmologists’. The US has no moral right to act as a leader of the Anglo-sphere.

However if it opts out of the Anglo-sphere, where will it be? In a few decades, it will be a cesspool of various language and cultural inputs, that can swing and rattle the nation to a level of hideous terror and panic. Already I am sure that even at this moment many of the US citizens would be feeling the real trauma of panic attack in their personal life. For, they are all being connected to various social levels of unknown negativity, without anyone asking them if they do allow such a link to happen

Inducing unsolicited panic attack

For example, when a US citizen is calling the John F Kennedy Airport in New York, he is simply guided to speak to a person in a far-off nation. Is this really allowable? For example, I call the District Police Officer in my native state. I am connected to his peon. He insists that he is the District Police Officer. However, I can judge from my own mental codes that I am being fooled. But there is no way that I can crosscheck or insist anything. Well, what is the problem if I talk to a peon who has been assigned to act as the Police officer? Well, there are certain issues of software codes in the virtual code arena. If I act with servitude to this man (as any Indian is supposed to), actually in the virtual code arena, I am belittling myself below the levels of an Indian peon. Well, it has its terrible negative effects. Even though I cannot physically hear the sneering derisive laughter of the low-level peon as he feels that he has fooled me, I would feel the creepy effects in my Life Software codes.

Similarly, if a native English speaker gets connected to a person from India, who masquerades as a person of equal mental and social standards, there is a heavy bit of deceit. For, actually this Indian personnel is not the same as a native-English personnel. For, the moment he meets any social superior from his own native town, he is a person who goes down to low levels in the indicant word codes. Moreover, he would be a person earning a slightly higher income than the other common Indians. So, he would be placing the common Indians at lower indicant level.

Such a person of quite unreliable standards is acting as an equal or superior of a commoner in an English nation. This will decay the native-English speakers’ own positive levels. In fact, there may be a tug, in the virtual code arena, towards a bout of panic attack. For, the trauma of feeling that one is dealing with an entity of doubtful and unreliable credentials. A feeling of being held down by a string that is powerful, yet negative. SEE CODES of REALITY! WHAT is LANGUAGE? : Back to mental conditions  

Click here to see the image of a poor girl in the US. What will be her mental stature when feudal language speakers refer to her as Aval, Pennu, edi, Nee, Thu etc? Will not such speakers sow tragedy into this nice English nation? Haven't they already done it? Who is in charge of the US now? Who represents the original people who created the US? 

Where the US has arrived

I would like to take up another allegory. Think of two different husbands in a feudal language nation. One has a wife who is totally committed to him. He goes about his business in a quiet manner. His wife helps him in his work, in a very steady, yet non-remarkable manner. She comes from a background that is quite similar to his own. However the other man has a wife who has come from a very low level social content. He trains her in many social attribute and then makes her companionable. Slowly she improves her standards, and starts getting the feel of the higher social culture. Soon she is accosted by very many persons who want a person of her social standards to join their business as a staff. Now, she is advised by her own family members to move ahead. For, they feel that she has more capacities than her husband. She joins another business firm, which is not directly competing with her husband’s business, but still it is another man’s business. Now, she is seen to be quite capable, for she moves in the social circles, and has her own level of friends and companions.

Her own family members declaim that she is of very high mental calibre, that such calibre is inherently in their heritage, and they can name a number of forefathers who were persons of great mental capacity, inside their low level social system. They continuously cajole her to strike out on her own. Everyone sees her husband’s business tottering as he finds it difficult to fend off the various business and social problems on his own. As his business goes down, the claim then comes up that his family is upheld by his wife’s income. The wife’s relatives go around saying that it is just because of her that he can live.

However, the other husband and his close companion wife are moving in a non-boisterous manner. At a simple glance, his wife is of no quality when compared to the other man’s wife, who is very visible in the social circles as another man’s employee.  

But then after some years, at a particular setting some people are forced to do a comparison between the two women and their families. It is then that the reality transpires and sets in. The quiet female is the owner of a business, while the swanky female is only one of the staff members of a feudal-language-society businessman. The first couple have their own business and a very strong financial acumen. The second man’s business has failed and there is nothing worthy of his own that be of comparable strength in his family. His wife can be claimed by another man.

Now, this allegory is a strange one. I focus here only on the second couple with the negligent wife. That wife is more or less comparable to the majority immigrant populations of the US. The US nation can be compared to her husband. She has been trained and improved beyond anything that her own family can bestow upon her. However, all her mental calibre improvement is claimed by the native family or nation.  The immigrant population basically come to make money by building upon the infrastructure and social ambience created by the native-English society. However, they have no long-term commitments to the nation, other than to land a fortune. They are not bothered even if the nation’s civic and social standards go down to dogs. It is the same case as of the husband. The wife is not really bothered about his social status degradation.

She was a business owner’s wife. Her becoming a staff of another business man has more significance than can be explained in English. For, her lowering of indicant word status would pull down her husband’s indicant word status. For, he is a staff-of-that-person’s husband. The He, Him, His all will be lowered as an appendage of the other businessman. He would literally show signs of fainting, panic attack, breathlessness, mental trauma and even homicidal mania. Well, I am not sure if the native population of the US (not America) have arrived at these levels.

NOTE: A person from a feudal language nation, after having arrived in the elevated ambience of an English nation, and claiming about his great ancestors, is like a person of very low family and caste standards, growing up financially and then show casing his own ancestors who were quite clever and geniuses. However, the real point that these geniuses were in a very low social platform far removed from the current day socially elevated platform of this person should not be forgotten. The platform is what makes the difference. END OF ALLEGORY

The terrible uncertainty that impinges on all social standards and decorum will affect persons of innate refinement in English nations. The question of what is acceptable and what is not, will come to the fore. Everything that is strange and offensive will redefine itself as another culture. And in a social mood of accepting other cultures without understanding them, weird, hideous, and even totally opposite of Standard English customs will stand to gain social licence.

Well, immigrants should be allowed in, only if they are willing to acknowledge the negativity that lives in themselves and their native nations. And they swear that they will not sow these negativities inside the English soil. If the reader feels that what I have mentioned here is something of the impossible, then the disastrous future of the US is also plausible. 

This goes for all English nations. Including, I am sad to say, fair England also.