Where the British Crown erred 

However, when the British Crown took over the power from the East India Company, the policymakers in England were to make a lot of idiotic mistakes. This was basically due to their misunderstanding that the ‘Indian’ kings were similar to the English monarchs. This was a terrible mistake. They gave statutory rights back to the Indian feudal lords, for their assessment of the Sepoy Mutiny was quite wrong. It is a fact that even at the peak hours of the Sepoy Mutiny, the vast majority of the native ‘Indian’ soldiery stood by their English officers. The policymakers back in England took the understanding that the seeming debacle was due to the disabling of the traditional feudal classes in ‘India’. The actual fact was that the vast majority of the natives stood by the English rule for the simple reason that they had been liberated from their traditional superiors by the English, who gave them access to much new knowledge, and avenues to social improvements there had never been there in their purview for centuries. Beyond all this, the area where the Sepoy mutiny took place was small when the total size of British-India is taken into consideration.For example, the Sikhs stood by the English. See picture: 

SEE this comment that came sneering at my comment on HuffingtonPost

kennyfloyd   May 13, 2012 at 12:03am

As to the definition of English occupation, the statement can also be redrafted into 'nations where English brought in liberation to the majority population'. Not counting WW2 were many countries liberated peoples from oppressors, who did England "liberate"? Canada, from the beaver, U.S. from...Spain, i'm guessing. Of course there was South Africa liberated from ahh, slaves, and who could forget India? India was liberated from who I forget. Where else, Palestine? Jamaica was liberated from Jamaicans? I'll give you the Falklands but I can't think of a nation that the majority was saved by the English and not occupied by them. You'll have to explain that one to me. What is a "higher order"? Does that mean your cool with East Europeans, and Pakistani's immigrating into England? If so I got that one wrong.

MY COMMENT: A person with scarce understanding of anything can write so many words. Each of these nations mentioned would need quite a bit of deep study to know who was liberated from whom. As to Palestine, I think the same idiot who created the mess in colonial areas, Atlee could be held responsible for allowing US based Zionist groups to ravage that place. In fact, in those times, it would have been quite easy to find a sparsely inhabited place somewhere in the world, where a Jewish independent state could have been setup. However, as is amply evident that US foreign policy is being run by rank outsiders, the cantankerous idea was to drive out the native population of the area currently called Israel, and to create the Jewish state.  Any man with some foresight could have seen that this idiotic idea was not to serve the Jews with a peaceful place of residence. It was to plunge generations of Jewish into a state of continuous belligerence and insecurity. Beyond that it has led to a very dangerous form of Islam, totally opposite to the personal disposition of Prophet Muhammad.

The fact is that Great Britain did have the loyalty of the Arabs. SEE Lawrence of Arabia. This loyalty was squandered by this idiot who became the Prime Minister of Britain.

As to the US, I think the commenter is mistaking North American continent with the US. US is a nation created by people from Britain in a land ravaged by Spanish and Portuguese Conquistadors. To a limited extend, the native populations were given some respite after some 300 years of Continental European brutality. 

When this stock idiotism became a statutory policy of the English rule in ‘India’, the English persons here in ‘India’ were in a terrible dilemma. No more could they remain outside the social system. They had to join. And when joining, they had to join at the heights. It was a stance that made them lose their position of spurring a revolutionary change in this geographical area. For, they from now on, had to gain the acceptance of the already entrenched feudal classes of the area.

THIS BOOK can be download as a Digital book from here