Words like Nee (lower you), Avan (lower he), Aval (lower she) etc. are lower level words that are used to subordinate a person among a group of persons. They also do have other connotations, like that of intimacy, endearment etc. However we are now not discussing about this second said features.
Being lower level words, they are quite powerful in their effect. But then, right inside them, or let us say, within them, there can be a wide variation in the numerical value of their negative effect. This value can depend on a number of items. We can now discuss here, how the factor of hierarchical strings can affect this numerical value.
One man comes to another persons house, with whom he has no personal acquaintance. He addresses him with a rude Nee. Now what is the power in this Nee? The other person can get annoyed, irritated, distracted, provoked, and seemingly subordinated. Or else, he can get subordinated, and made obsequious.
In the first case, the other person can react in a manner as to correct the other mans verbal behaviour; or he can go in for a verbal attack back. In each of these different reactions, what happens are of different social significance.
But then in the other situation, wherein he goes in for a willing subordination, the situation is totally different.
Now what creates all these differences? Well, it could depend on the power that is encoded in the Nee that was delivered. What lends this power?
Well, look at this scenario: the person who has come to the house is an Indian police constable. The Indian constable is a lowly official in the police department. Most of them of very negligible intellectual attainments, and mostly of very low English knowledge. They are kept at the servant class subordinate levels by their officers by the use of lower indicant words, and by forcing them to use higher indicant words to and about their officers.
Yet, they are quite powerful when they accost the ordinary persons of India. For, they are part of a string of hierarchy, wherein their Nee, is actually the lowering of the person to a **** level much below that of the constable. The person who is thus addressed by a Nee by an Indian constable is more or less held in a vice-like grip by this word, and its associated words like Avan, Aval etc.
There is a loaded power in this Nee, as it comes to hammer the ordinary individual.
If the ordinary individual tries to equalise the situation by using a Nee back towards the police constable, it is like a weak army attacking a powerful fortification. He will be battered down. Actually, in real life, the ordinary individual will not be mentally able to put up such an attack back.
Now, suppose the individual who has come to the house is an ordinary individual. His Nee has no power encoded inside it, that pours into it from the routes of the powerful hierarchy. It is a Nee devoid of any power.
What I wanted to convey here was that even though there are indicant words of different levels, in actual reality, the power that is encoded in them does depend on the routes of hierarchy through which they are delivered.
An indicant words that stands in a solitary position with no powerful string attached cannot be much forceful. Yet, it can by its very poor strength be also a powerful disintegrating entity. There is where the whole concept of indicant words can be quite complicated, and much, much beyond the ordinary understanding of a native English speaker.
I can give a hint. A socially feeble man is addressing the householder with a Nee. It is a feeble Nee. Yet, it is an action of ****ification. For, he is literally trying to pull down the householder to abominable levels. What is the defence against this? Well, the householder can address him back with a Nee. However, this only makes him equal to the other man. The best defence against this would be to act as if he has not seen or mentally detected the other man. In fact, in India, people do practise this act of not detecting certain others in the society.
Encoding non-verbal signals
Now, at this point I need to enlarge this idea to encompass non-verbal signals. Imagine persons who are in a powerful string of hierarchy in a feudal language social system. One among them is a non-willing participant. However, due to the force of circumstance, or by deliberate treachery, he is occupying a position in the string. He does not say or utter any word, usage or sentence that is out of step with the direction of the string.
However he does use non-verbal signals like glaring at his superior, wrinkling his forehead and eyebrows, casting offensive gestures, sitting with a impertinent pose, not doing what is expected of him, doing what he should not do, looking at his superior as if he is looking at a subordinate and such things. Well, in feudal languages, all of the above mentioned things are clearly connected to lower indicant words. However, in English, even though, it is possible do all the things mentioned, there is no connection to any lower indicant word or code groups. However, the negative gestures, poses, and intentions are really connected to some negative codes that purposefully spoil some well aligned system and string of command. Here it may be mentioned in passing that many minor gesture of impertinence used in feudal languages would go unnoticed in English.
Now, what am I trying to tell here? Well, it is that even non-verbal things can be encoded into codes in the virtual software. It is here, the real basis of such things that are commonly called evil eye and such things can be deciphered.
When a person from a perceived lower position views another person, say a youngster from a higher indicant level, with an expression of viewing a minor person, it is really equivalent to addressing the youngster with a Nee, and referring to him or her with a Avan or Aval ( all of very low indicant level). All the negative connotations associated with these lower level wordings can be forced on the youngster by a mere looking by the lower person. For, the lower person certainly gets a lot of negative powers, when the settings are that of a feudal language.
This lower persons very touch can be different from that of a higher persons. To a limited extent, it depends on how the person views the higher person. However, if it displays any level of superiority or acquaintanceship of an equal level, it can send in negative codes into the personal attributes of the superior person.
Actually the very existence of untouchables is connected to feudal languages. In a language setting like that of English, untouchables cannot be created. However, untouchables can be created by other languages and or associated codes. These can be slightly felt by others in an English settings also. To some extent, the phenomena known as racial antipathy can be explained through this understanding. However, the concept of racial antipathy and repulsion, especially by English native speakers towards persons from feudal language setting, cannot be fully explained by this brief interpretation. But then, the repulsion is more or less fully due to the fearsome unsettling, feudal language settings can impose of perfect English social settings.
Decoding emotional expressions
Every human emotional expression can be encoded into verbal codes. For example, the warmth conveyed by a smile can be directly decoded into lines like: I like you, I love you, I am happy with you, My regards to you, I support you, I am shifting my loyalty to you, My loyalty remains intact, My support for your endeavours and so many other similar things, including that of a simple Hi. The receiver of these codes does get the appropriate mental elevation, exuberance, liveliness, high spirits etc. At many times, it is these minor bits of energising codes that makes the difference between success and defeat for a person, who is balancing between the tilting swings of success and defeat.
However, it should be understood that when one person or side is thus conveyed such energy, it may result in a depletion of energy in another side. For example, when a wife sends such energising codes to a person who is a competitor of her husband, then actually she is empowering a side which stands in opposition to that of her husband. This empowering can be at the expense of her husbands vital energies.
Actually there need not be any conscious emotional conveying of energy. If a wife or a confident, or a known follower of one person is seen directly or in a photo in a position of proximity, it can create powerful shift in the virtual world. Actually, there is only the reality of a lot of persons seeing this scene that has made the powerful shifts of position and location; and change of values in codes. Yet, in actuality there may not really be any such shifting of loyalty. Still the image is powerful and can create powerful changes. Here what is seen is the power of eyes. It can create codes, which are powerful and can add and minus numerical values in codes.
It may be understood that every change in the energy in the virtual code world makes powerful shifts of location and potential in a persons code and position in the virtual code world.
Yet, it must again be stressed that the power of these codes are quite high in feudal language world, as compared to that in the English world. In the feudal language world, the shifts are huge, powerful and of explosive power. It is quite different from that in the English world. Yet, it is there, in a minor manner.
Items that brings in energy
There are codes for energy. May be there are no specific codes of lack of energy, other than the mere absence of the codes of energy.
Now, what are the things that can bring in vitality? I speak from my observations.
One is the presence of followers and disciples. Another is the higher indicant words. Good dress, good address, socially acknowledged higher class friends (especially in feudal language settings), arrival in a higher class vehicles and such. Apart from all this, such non-verbal inputs such as the smile of a beautiful woman, seeing beautiful things and scenery; beautiful women, energising songs, lovely music and such. Also, mention of higher level connection.
Apart from all this, invitations from certain social areas. This can also include an invitation for sex by woman, a chance to commit adultery on another persons wife and such. Such thing however create some sort of flare-up codes. However, a successful performance of sex, can really create powerful codes of energy. A failure in this regard can bring in a leak of vitality.
Well, it may be understood that negative things can also lend energising vitality. There might be other long term repercussions on receiving negative inputs, but then at the moment, it does create energy codes in the software.
What lies behind ordinary words
There are ordinary words. What is the code that is connected to them in the virtual space? Well, words are the creation of software codes in the virtual arena. To that extend, any specific word may have that a specific code encrypted in it. However, as that specific word gets used by persons, that word comes to carry other codes attached to it, and a direction component also comes into play.
It is like this: A man is on an enterprise. If he succeeds, he gets out of the compromising situation in a particular setting, that encases him. However, if he fails in his endeavour, he is stuck in the terrible situation from which he wants to escape. In many ways, this is what a business success and failure means.
Now, when the endeavour is being commenced, everyone, including his subordinates, disciples, wife and children are working along with him. Their all words and actions are focused on the enterprise succeeding. However, suddenly one of them, may be his main subordinate, disciple or wife, says a word that is connected to something that is for the setting up of a thing in the area from where they are trying to escape. It may be a simple word, like a door, a TV, a washing machine, a pathway or some such thing.
It suggestive of the possibility that the enterprise would fail, and when they are back to square one, they would be in need of this thing.
Well, that word mentioned at the very critical moment of starting of the enterprise, is a very negative and backward directed word. It is focused on failure of the enterprise. Now, what happens is a deeply upsetting thing. Everyone is poised for the winning, and one main person among them is proposing a negative direction in the enterprise. It can create a jerk-like feel in the concerned persons mind. In terms of loyalty, optimism, actions towards goal-reaching, discipline, support and such things, it is a totally negative word. In the virtual codes, it can stand out as a negative sticking-out word, with a powerful reverse direction component.
However, this single word in itself need not spell disaster for the enterprise. However, it shall have its negative effect, at least temporarily. The success of the endeavour may not depend on such solitary issues, but then if the person who has done this misdemeanour is in a significant location in the virtual arena, he or she can stand as a powerful negative entity.
Now what can make a confidante go out of sync? Well, the easiest and possibly the most powerful thing that can do this might be simple words or messages that reach him or her, from sources which are not part of the string in which he/she are connected to his or her leader/husband/wife/partner etc. If such sources are not in sync or are having antipathy towards his or her string, then each minor word or information shall contain loaded codes that are timed to disrupt meticulously planned operations.
Personal links are powerful, and they remain as routes in the virtual world of codes, through which powerful strings are attached, flung at or connected to persons, events, institutions, command structures etc.
A routing word
Recently it was mentioned during the marriage of Kate with Prince William of Great Britain that she was not to use the word obey in her vow of commitment to Prince William. I do not wish to debate here about the idea of women being equal to men or of wife being an equal partner to her husband, even though there is much to be said about those themes.
The word obey is not a single word, as seen from a materialistic view. It is actually only a visible part of a huge software program that is connected to marital relationship. There are a whole lot of codes in the virtual software that connects the husband to the wife and vice versa. The word obey is one such code that that gives a final sharpening of the focus of the wife on to the husband.
This code is quite different from and literally the opposite of the word disobey. The deleting of the word obey from the vow does not naturally mean that there is sense of the code disobey. However, the word obey does bring in sharpness to the whole entity called family, in that it is like an arrow that has to move forward through the tough material of future life events. The absence of the word obey simply brings in looseness to the unit, and at times there can be bluntness to the arrow that is the family unit. In that, the wife may start exhibiting a different perspective of what needs to be done. This then can give rise to an arrow that has parts in it, that moves in either parallel direction or away from the main route of the arrow.
In such a scenario, the arrow can lose it momentum. It may still move forward if its natural momentum is quite high.
What I tried to show here was the vector component that is attached to such powerful words.
Before moving from this theme, I would like to say that in every kind of human relationship, the word obey is of compelling power. For example, in military, in an office, in a business place and such. However, the exact power and meaning of this word depends on the language. What it proposes in English is quite different from what it means in feudal languages. In English, the word obey in its legitimate form and in its most powerful stance means only obeying only permissible instructions. In feudal languages, this word may mean much more than can be visualised in English.
