National character

The national character of a feudal language nation is intimately connected to the inbuilt switches of fears, phobias, paranoia, spilt and multiple personality and of social splitting, that are all encoded into that specific feudal language.

For example, in a nation like India, the feudalism in the languages has a special feature. The hierarchy or feudalism is not on a single line of precedence or hierarchy. Instead, varying attributes compete. In more plain words, it may be said that such things as age, financial acumen, job position, physical prowess, physical size, caste level, disposition for impoliteness and such things can all be factors that can place a person on the higher levels of the hierarchy. Basically it is enforced by a mean level of irascibility. The idea is to suppress the other individual by basing the hierarchy to suit ones requirement to reach the higher level. It is successful if the other individual concedes to that particular factor of hierarchy. For example, in most places, persons use financial acumen to enforce their superiority in language codes. However, the other individual may immediately try to take recourse by alluding to his superiority in age.

It is a very unsettling kind of equilibrium that is reached, which can tumble down the moment the props of the other factors of superiority goes down. For example, if the superiority has been enforced based on an individuals financial stamina; and suddenly it is felt that it is a bit shaky. Immediately there is a resonance felt in the language code also. It gives rise to a very dangerous connection between individuals.

A lot of connected social emotions come into play due to this shaky nature of human relationships. For example, no one likes to see the prosperity of another person. He or she may go to many lengths to see if it is possible to neutralise any possible social or financial elevation in others who had been of equal social and financial standing.

Moreover, there is always the issue of not being efficient as a means of acting as a barrier to another person becoming efficient. For example, a deal has been made between two persons. Later it is felt that if one person among them does his or her part of the deal perfectly on time, the other may be able to perform fantastically. Then, a lot of others would come into the picture to dissuade the first person from doing his or her part of the deal correctly. For, if the second person is seen to be able to accomplish something great by just getting his or her setting correct, it can upset many persons indicant value positions.  

In India, even though there is a lot of hype on spirituality and compassion, the truth is that no one likes to see another person in a cosy situation. There is real delight in seeing another person in distress. No one likes to see another person rising up in social and financial standards, other than persons who are their own mentors. This evil mood, which is the real cause of the mess in the nation, is directly connected to the feudal languages here.

It is a very big theme, and currently I do not intend to discuss the various components here. A major part of it has already been discussed by me in my old book: March of the evil empires; English verses the evil empires. Here I would like to deal with the issue of what would happen to a non-feudal language nation, when the nation is swarmed by persons of feudal language nativity.

Entry of feudal codes into English social systems

There are many things that can happen to this nation, which can be quite dangerous. However at this moment, let me dwell upon one single item.

Nations where a non-feudal language is spoken, may or can have formal feudal social systems, monarchies, and many other institutional items that are all really the hangovers of antiquity. These are essentially not the creations of their non-feudal language.
For example, in Britain there is a feudal social set up, with the monarchy coming at the top. However, this feudal set up is not a creation of the English language. It is actually a continuation of the feudal social set up that was there in Europe. However, the English feudal experience was markedly different from the feudal experiences of European nations. For, English language could more or less act as a softener of the feudal codes. And so, it was quite tolerable, as against the feudalism in certain other European nations, where the people did feel its stings.

Due to the softening stance of English, the monarchy, the nobility and the commoners could exist in a mood of being quite close to each other.

Now it is into this soft arena that people from such powerfully feudal language systems like Asian and African nations are entering. What their language systems and codes can do is to separate the social system into higher ups of divine qualities and the lower persons of stinking personalities. So that as time moves on, the commoners would sense a feel of repulsiveness towards them from the higher ups, including the financially strong classes. A quite new mood of virtual distances would creep into the national conscience and create an entirely new feel in everyone. It is a strange negativity that would be felt spreading everywhere.

A new feel of antipathy of higher ups would spread among the lower groups. It would be an experience that would be quite un-English in everything about it.

The same kind of feel can enter into many other nations, if such similar people are allowed the free run inside. For example, a quite vulnerable social system would be that of Arabic. Arabic seems to me to be a language with remarkable similarity to English in terms of not having feudal content in many sections of its codes.  {I am not sure about this. Moreover, I have a feeling that certain Arabic dialects like that of Egypt could have some negative elements inside them.}

In such societies, if similar feudal language groups are allowed the free run, the society would wince with a terrifying force of being pulled apart vertically. A feeling among the common person that they are seen as repulsive by the higher sections of the society would set in. It can lead to powerful turbulences inside the nation.

Another affect of the intrusion of such feudal language software inside the nation would be the separation of many jobs into quality, medium quality, medium repulsive and very repulsive quality. This separation would be according to the codes that the feudal languages assign to the various jobs and professions. It can really kill the soft balances that had been quietly created by English language, over centuries of social experiences.   

Another very visible feature of the entry of feudal languages would be the gradual, yet powerful rise of the powers of the officialdom, as reflected in their pay, perks, pension and other frills; as well as a growing aura of un-approachability slowly coming to settle upon them. For the feudal languages would push in a wedge into the social communication system, by which the officialdom would move farther away from the common folk, and come to cloak themselves with a Brahminical aura.

There is an immensity of changes to the English social mood that feudal codes can bring about. I had dealt about them many years ago in my earlier book on feudal languages: March of the evil empires; English verses the feudal languages. However, when I first wrote that book many years ago, my own understandings about this phenomenon was quite superficial; even though I did do some cursory debate on the theme of inner codes.

Before concluding this discussion on the effects of feudal languages on English social systems, I may mention the issue of dressing standards. Most of the English dresses are what may be said to be devoid of respect as understood in feudal languages. For, they do not come up for the scrutiny and evaluation from the concept of respect and disrespect as one comes to understand the terms in feudal languages. However, once the feudal languages make an entry into the easygoing English social apparatus, the issue of attire being capable of garnering respect or not would crop up, incessantly. It can lead to a dampening of the warmth in the English social scene.

When differing software social systems impact in the virtual software arena

Well, this is an issue of global ramifications. The question in the material world would be: What would be the effect if a social system like that of non-feudal English were to come to get stuck with a social system that is based on feudal languages; without any protective shields for the former systems. Well, for answering this, one needs to go into the virtual arena and visualise the events. Persons, institutions and even events are arranged around a planar area, more or less near to the plane in English. However, in the feudal language virtual arena, all these things are flung far apart, and also in varying heights in a canyon-to-sky like vertical height.

When the two systems collide, the individuals in the English systems can get to feel the tumble and powerful dislocation of themselves and their institutions. Many of them would topple down and tumble down into the depths.  Financial institutions would crumble down as their props, which are their customers fall down. Many conventions would stand rotted.

However for the persons from the feudal language systems, it would be a most satisfying experience. For they would find themselves slowly move towards a common focus as they are pulled towards a planar area. A new found power may enter in them.

However on the whole, an amalgamation without understanding the issues involved can really bring in disaster in the long run. For the English systems, if left unprotected, may tumble down, and in the long run, the feudal virtual software would take over the whole place. 

Codes of slavery and liberation

What is slavery? Even though educated persons are indoctrinated to connect this concept with the Black slaves of America of the yesteryears, the actuality is that the so-called Black slaves of US do not really represent slavery; rather they remain as symbols of the entry of codes of liberation inside human beings. It may seem quite a contrary idea.

Real slavery is a mental attitude. For example in India, the thread of slave and slave-master relationship runs right down to the bottoms from the heights. For example, if one goes to interiors in Kerala, one can find the master addressing his servant class with a Nee, eda, edi etc. and referring to them as Avan, Aval, Avattakkal etc. The serving class does not view this as insult, demeaning, snubbing etc. They address their master as chettan, thamburan, sar etc. Actually what is seen in this relationship is real love and affection between the two. What the master achieves through his words is a sort of enrolment of the others as his disciples and followers. The serving class see their master as their leader and idol. The master sees them as his disciples and followers.

Now if into this relationship, some English codes are allowed to enter, what would happen? Well, the unique placing of the master at the epitome and the serving persons as followers gets dismantled. A sort of lowering of the master and the rising of position of the serving class takes place. There is real dismantling of the serene relationships.

Actually there was one communist chief minister in Kerala, who was from a slightly upper caste. He was very liberal in his use of lowering words of addressing and referring of his partys lower cadre. Yet, they did not take it as an affront. Instead, they took it as a sign of deep affection he had for them. The same sort of affection that the feudal lord has for his serfs.

It may be seen that this feeling is the total essence of slavery as a mental feeling. However, since this phenomenon has not been understood, no one sees it as a system of slavery. For, there may not be any visible signs of force and regimentation. Yet, the powerful codes in the language and in the virtual code area, does really bring in a regimentation and mental slavery that has the power of astronomical standards. For, the huge nation of India is enwrapped in this system.

This slavery is actually a regimentation that is connected to discipline and command route, and very compulsive. For example, when a man marries a woman, her parents, uncles, aunts, elder brothers and sisters, elder cousins and even senior neighbours come into positions of command over the husband. What can limit the power of this command can be the physical distance of the newlywed couples residence from them, the husbands financial clout, physical prowess, power of words etc.

As for the wife, she remains an intimate component of the command lines that stretch from her parents, and the rest of the others mentioned above. In many cases of marital discord that can soon arise, the real reason may be the non-tangible presence of these command lines that pull and push the wife, even as the husband tries to get her to come into the functioning lines of the newly formed family unit.

The issue can also be that it is the wife who is trying to bring the husband in the functioning lines of the newly formed family unit.

The children in a family are essentially a sort of slaves of the parents in the feudal language. Yet, they also do not feel the burden of slavery, for they are mentally trained to feel at ease in its cosy comfort. Just as the serf is mentally at ease in the presence of his master and feudal lord. He feels the cosy protection of his master.

The idea that the children are a sort of slaves of the parents in a feudal language cannot be easily visualised, unless one were able to breed children from the same background in total English. Then one may be able to understand the difference in positioning of the children in relation to their parents. If one is able to do this, a totally different relationship and command lines can be seen. For in the second case, many of the easily administered commands in the feudal language may become powerful draconian commands that can be enforced only with a bit of verbal power and at times physical intimidation. For, the children and their parents more or less exist at more nearer positions when seen vertically. As for the children in the feudal language settings, the children exist much below the position of their parents, when viewed vertically.

Now coming to the issue of formal slaves, there is this thing to be noted. Slavery is and was prevalent all over the world. For example, in India, in every kingdom, and even under every landlord there were slaves. Yet, they were willing ones, who would not accept that they are slaves. Yet, they would mentally find salvation in doing the biddings of their masters, and their master race. The more snubbing words are used to and about them, the more disciplined and obliging they become. The more respectful and non-demeaning words are used to and about them, the less disciplined and less obliging they become. 

For example, the servant is addressed as Nee. If the masters liberal-attitude son addresses him as Ningal, the servant would not see it as politeness. It would be seen as pure ineptitude of the son, and the servant would stop obliging him and would soon act irascible and impertinent to him. For the word Nee is actually a word of regimentation, and converts a person to an obliging disciple. What the son has done is literally removed the servant from that position and made him an equal. From this position, the servant finds it irritable to be treated as a subordinate. He revolts.

In many ways, this is what English also does. It raises the level of all persons who are subordinate, and brings down the levels of all persons who are at the master level. In this setting, the subordinate is quite aware of his equality with his master, and also of his right to dignified behaviour from his master. It is a feeling that is never there in a serving person who is a subordinate in a feudal language setting.

As for the master in the English setting, he or she can be quite aware and also quite uncomfortable of the fact that the slave is also a human being of equal dignity. In such a distressing mental state of the setting, slavery cannot be enforced other than by brute physical means, such as statutory laws, punishments, and in extreme cases, chains.

In other words, what the Negro slaves could be made to do by the force of statutory laws, and physical punishments, the subordinated people of India could be made to do just by the captive force inherent in the feudal languages.

Slavery in marriage  

In India, there is a newly emerging understanding that the wife is a slave of the husband, who needs to be saved from his thraldom by means of statutory laws.

Actually this feeling as risen due to the actions of nitwits who want to fiddle with the social machinery without having adequate understanding of what it is they are dealing with.  When seen from English, there are immense differences in the Indian social scene. For example, in an English nation, the subordinate is not much below his superior in that the words You, He, She, His, Him, Her etc. are all same for both.

In the Indian feudal languages, there is a sharp lowering of status for the subordinate. Similarly, the wife in the Indian setting is quite different from a wife in an English nation. If the woman in India is feeling a lowering of status, it is not something imposed on her by her husband. It is a position that is assigned to her in words by her parents, her brother and sister, her uncles and aunts, and by all her other family members, her teachers, her friends, neighbours and others. When a marriage takes place, what takes place can be a removing of her from these command links and placing her in another command link. In many ways, it is a very powerful shift. The cosy feel of the old command links have to be shredded. It can be a bit unnerving for everyone concerned.

The essential issue of marital discord arises as soon as the ancient command links try to re-connect on to her. If she is not willing to disconnect their powerful enwrapping links, the husband or his family members may get distressed. It is not some imaginary feeling. For, the links are quite real, and they will feel them prodding in their midst, trying to impose outside commands and compulsions on to her.

As for the parents, when their daughter gets married, they are really losing one of their very powerfully placed disciples. They would feel this loss powerfully. For, when a disciple is lost, that much leadership vanishes. Yet, in most Indian marriages, the parents usually gain. For instead of losing a disciple, they actually gain one more disciple; her husband. He also comes in the same location that she also stood. He is also then a Nee, an Avan and such things.

The issue of gain and loss depends on what the husband aims to do. If he is willing to be a Nee, and Avan etc. for his in-laws, well then there is marital happiness. If on the other hand, he is a free bird, then it is a right recipe for marital discord. Yet, the wife can save the family unit by coupling powerfully with her husband. In which case, he becomes the leader.

If on the other hand, the wife stands by her own family members, then they would see the husband as an evil person, who is trying to enslave his wife. Actually, this issue of slavery is only a perspective. Either the husbands slave or her own parents slave.  What she likes is not slavery, what she does not like is slavery.

Now it may be mentioned in passing that even this aspect of being slavish and not slavish, may have its specific codes in the virtual software. The change from one to another may happen as certain links are manoeuvred, shifted and or replaced.

The wrappings of leadership

Here one may think about leadership.  When a husband is supported by a wife, his leadership capacity goes up. When he does the same for his wife, the same goes up for his wife. However, this leadership codes can be extended by anyone. For example, the wifes relatives can dislodge her from her links with her husband and inform her that they are willing to stand by her. What happens is that she feels a sudden shower of leadership qualities, wherein she might feel a newfound freedom in detaching from her husband. Well, what has taken place is just a destruction of another persons leadership capacity. For the basic requirement for leadership is to have a committed follower. By removing the husbands supporter, that is, his wife, he is left devoid of his leadership capacity; or at least it is that much affected negatively.

Now, let us go into the encoding of leadership. Leadership is not just a physical phenomenon. It is deeply connected to codes in the virtual software. When the associated persons put in their focus on to a person or organisation or programme, there comes into existence a powerful encoding of software. This specifically formed software connects the various persons to each other. Each one of them is uniquely positioned in the software code.

Some of them may occupy very critical positions in the coding, while others may not be in such vital areas of the codes. If suddenly one of the persons in a vital position simply moves himself or herself out of the enwrapping links, there is a sudden jolt in the leadership or focus or attraction in a person, programme or organisation.

This can be felt very easily in many human experiences. Such as, when a street performer is performing. There is a crowd of persons around him. His mind is focused on some of the viewers as he speaks out to them, and slowly tries to entice their thoughts to his endeavours. Suddenly if one of the persons that he has focused on moves away, he would immediately feel the dent. Whether he would be able to continue on without faltering may depend on his mental stamina and experience. Yet, the negative effect is there, and he would feel it.

The same is there is many other human endeavours, where one person is riding forward holding on to stabilising strings extended mentally by others. For example, an intimate friend lends the morale to a person on a dangerous endeavour, a wife stands by her husband as he tackles the intricacies of business problems and such. Well, if suddenly the intimate friend or the wife moves away from preset positions, there can be sudden detachment of these stabilising strings. As if the other person has been disconnected from strings that convay mental and physical power. He may feel a sudden void.

However, in the virtual software arena, this is not just such a simple, solitary incident. For, many persons are connected to each other in the virtual arena. A slight negative value encoding on a person can make him overwhelmed by other codes that arrive from elsewhere. For, each person in society is being preyed upon by an immensity of codes and distractions. When he or she goes down, they powerfully perch on his codes.

It thus happens that when negative actions are done by persons who are intimate or believed to be trustworthy, a whole lot of other negative things can befall a person. Including accidents, propagation of negative stories, failure in other unconnected things and such.