Creating leaders and leadership

Even though it is generally believed that leadership is an innate quality of certain individuals, the truth is that it can be designed and created by meticulous planning. Especially in feudal languages. In feudal languages, leadership is an idea that needs to be conveyed. All it needs for starting is one single person who is ready to stand forth as a follower. He or she would get up in the other mans presence, thus conveying the idea that this man is a leader to others around. Then the follower goes around mentioning his leaders name with a suffix of respect attached, such as Chettan, Sar, Chechhi, Annan, Ji, Mahatma etc. Depending on the social level of this follower, many others in the local society also start mentioning his name with the suffix of respect attached.

Actually what has happened in the virtual codes is that the other mans codes is slowly getting filled with higher numerical values. As it strengthens, the very presence of this man in the social arena would be a gathering of positive values. Respect goes up. In feudal language systems, leadership is closely connected to respect. Or may be both are synonymous.

Actually this method of developing leadership is very commonly used by cunning persons in feudal language systems. The very seeing of a person being accompanied by some three or four persons who are willing to lend him or her obedience is a very powerful theme that can get encoded into the codes of the individual powerfully. Hence in nations like India, in all social interactions, persons take care to take a few persons with them, at an introductory level. Once the leadership codes are properly informed, then the need for other companions is not there. For, once the words of respect have been properly encoded, then it works on its own.

In other words, anyone can be made a leader by just planting the correct followers or disciples in proper positions in the social machinery. The power of that particular social machinery can greatly help in propagating the concept of a particular persons leadership quality. A very great example can be Gandhi. His fame can be greatly attributed to such things as a very supportive newspaper media of his times. As one by one more and more disciples came into existence, each one of them created by newspaper reports, he became more and more of a leader. Later each of his thus created disciples in the vernacular media in the far flung states of British India stood as props and disseminator of his leadership.

So that he slowly emerged as a giant, quite exceeding his real self and capacity. The word Ji became a powerful statement. Words of He came to be of the higher indicant level. Another powerful input was the word Mahatma. The power of these words was quite obvious to many of the others who knew him. To the uneducated persons, he was a person on the celestial heights. The very fact that he was an England-returned person was also a very powerful prop. In India, any England-returned person carries a powerful aura of superiority. In fact, it may be a change that would be reflected in his virtual codes also.

Many persons who were aware of the sham that was creating a larger than life image for Gandhi were not quite amused by these tactics. In fact there were some persons who tried to bring him back to earthly levels. For example, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who was then a Congress party leader, did refer to Gandhi as Mr. Gandhi. Saying Mr. Gandhi would be equivalent to blasphemy in the presence of Gandhis revering followers. They shouted Jinnah down, and literally made him run down the stage, from where he was speaking.

There was so much power in words, and they wouldnt allow another aspiring leader to rob their leader of his exalted position by a mere change of word code. Jinnah moved out from Congress and went to form the Muslim League.

As for Gandhi, he rose to so powerful levels in the virtual codes that even when slanderous stories of his peccadilloes inside his ashram in Sabarmati came out in Delhi, not many vernacular newspapers were willing to print them. Such was the powerful hold Gandhi had come to occupy in their mind. Dislodging him from his powerful slot was more or less a tedious task.

Here it follows that anyone can be made a leader by just planting the right disciple or follower in the right slots in the social machinery. They just have to stand in their position and implant words of respect on to the individuals name and references. The virtual codes would then carry on the work on their own.

Feudal languages and population explosion

It may be noticed that societies that have feudal languages have a natural tendency to multiply fast. Actually the issue of population explosion has two different components. One is the extremely dangerous political theory called democracy that the British has sown in totally ill-prepared nations. It has evolved a new kind of power in such nations that is entirely based on numerical strength, without any link to human quality. So to garner strength, all groups with political ambitions do advocate rapid reproduction.

However, feudal language social systems do have another innate reason for multiplying fast. It is based on the issue of leadership being formed by having followers. In feudal languages, children necessarily are followers and disciples, for they are made to exist in the lower indicant levels words with regard to their parents. For the parents, the children exist as the powerful props that make them leaders. In such social systems, without a show of leadership, a person can very fast go down the drain of lower indicant words. So, there is always a spontaneous need to have more children.

Along with this issue is the compulsive need to be a leader of some sorts in a feudal language society. For only acknowledged leaders can arrive and stay on the higher indicant word levels. At this level, everything is in the superlative form.

As against this, nations with lesser quantum of feudalism in their languages can do without having a stream of children as appendages.

Language and social flare up

Almost all social flare ups can be traced to the language code issues. Even in India most Hindu-Muslim antagonism is deeply entrenched in indicant word issues. I have already mentioned that caste based antagonism is language code based.

Moreover the so-called Islamophobia currently seen in European nations is actually not connected to Islam as such, but to the instinctive fear of feudal language speaking groups who spontaneously arrange themselves under certain command centres, that are encoded in their feudal language codes. The Islam that is currently creating fear in Europe is not really the version of Islam that Prophet Mohammed may have tried to spread. For Islam in its pristine form is not a feudal communication system encoded religion. However, the Islam that currently exists in Asian nations is fully feudal communication code encrypted. And hence, possibly totally an opposite version of original Islam.

This theme may also take us to the issue of the flare-up between the Jews and Germans. It is a truth that the Jews were seen as a truculent group even in other European nations. The mood of belligerence that they created in many places in Europe may be either due to some negative coding in their language dialects, or with the language dialects of Europe that they had to live with. A candid study in this regard may bring up the real reasons that made the Germans go totally mad with them.

For, somewhere in the virtual code arena, words and usage might have become ferociously provocative, as they interacted with each other. Many of these words and usages would have codes and directions of exclusivity that can ignite burning antipathy in the excluded groups.

Persons who are more interested in this theme may visit: Communal Tension and Language Codes in the Social and Communal Issues Section in this webpage.      

The military machine and language

Once a college mate of mine who was an officer in the Indian army told me of a visiting military team from Israel. They had been given the opportunity to see a part of the military training for the ordinary soldiers. The Israeli team were more or less perturbed by the brutishness of the training. The Indian army officer (my old college mate) told me in a mood of elation that the Israeli team had commented that what they had seen was not military training, but just pure inhumanity. The Indian army officer was trying to convey to me the extreme toughness of the Indian army training.

It is a fact that most feudal language military systems are quite the very opposite of an English army system. The real inner functioning of such armies depends on the inner codes of their feudal language/s. In the Indian army, it is quite connected to the Indian feudal language code.

Here it may be mentioned that the Indian military, though perfunctorily a continuation of the British Indian army, after independence changed its character fully. Earlier it had been a system that functioned with an inner core of English standards. Now the essential codes are connected to Hindi, a highly feudal language.

Now the beastliness in the training is connected to a very specific theme. The need to erase all fragments of the various hierarchical codes that are inherently attached to an Indian citizen. For example, a Malayalam speaking person would be connected to so many seniors and juniors in society and family by a variety of feudal hierarchies. These codes are superficially such as Chettan (elder brother), Chechi (elder sister), Ammavan (uncle), Ammayi (aunt), Adheham (respected Him), Avar (respected Him and Her), Achhan (father), Amma (mother) and so many others. All these words are powerfully connected to him by other words such as Nee (lower you), Avan (lower him) and such.

Now once this young man joins the Indian army, the essential requirement for military discipline would be to erase all these hierarchical strings wherein he is under so many commands, and also wherein he is a respected person to so many lower individuals in society. Many of his officers can be youngsters, to whom he has not been mentally trained to be obsequious. For, they are young. So a very brutal training has to be imparted to him, wherein he understands his meek position in the powerful military machine. His inherent feelings of adoration, worship etc. to other human entities should be removed. Any feelings of mental superiority that he has over any human level based on age, caste, familys social position and such should be totally removed. To achieve such a level of denudation of innate mental indoctrinations really requires a terrible mental crushing experience.

At the end of the training, what comes out is a total serf of the officer class, who shall keep him at divine positions. Yet, the person is more or less, deficient in much intellectual independence including resourcefulness. Moreover, if at any time, the officer class fails to maintain its larger-than-life superiority, this solder would mutiny. He is a just a mere machine made to perform under the total pressure of the crushing military discipline. Beyond that, his total commitment and loyalty towards the nation and the systems it is trying to protect is always in question.

It may be noted that the brutish military training in the Indian army is aimed at making powerful changes in the virtual software codes.

Indiscipline in the Indian bureaucracy

Total indiscipline is rife in the Indian bureaucracy. However, it may not be quite visible to an ordinary observer. For one may easily see the obsequious respect and the common usage of the word Sar, to the seniors, extended by the juniors. However, the issue here is that inside the bureaucracy there is a hierarchy, which encases everyone. Yet, there are a lot of other hierarchies in the local social system which also extends on to the individuals. He keeps a number of closely connected persons from outside the bureaucracy in positions of deep respect; elder brothers, elder sisters, uncles, aunts, father, mother, teachers, social seniors and such. Moreover, he has a lot of commitment towards persons, who extends him respect. All these strings are quite powerfully attached to him. However, to the common member of the public, he has no such respect or commitment. They remain a part of the nuisance in his life. For, as per his understanding, they come under him in social position. Yet he has to do work for them. There is no need to respect them. Actually, the way his organisation works, makes him understand that they have to extend him respect.

Now, whatever order is given to him by his seniors in his organisation is not really with a powerful string. Actually the power of this order or instruction depends to a great extend on to the words by which he is addressed by his seniors. For example, in Malayalam, the senior can address him with a Ningal or with a Nee. In the latter case, it is more powerful. Yet, these words can really create different reactions in different persons. In certain persons (due to a variety of other issues), the first word Ningal, can either create a feeling of quietude or a feeling of inadequate power in the instruction. In the case of the latter words, Nee, it can create either a feeling of being powerfully commanded, or feeling of being overburdened by a stifling atmosphere. Both these contradictory emotions depend on the inner superiority-inferiority codes in the virtual software of the individual.

If he is a person with some level of superior mental or social attributes, he would be affable with the Ningal and mutinous with the Nee. If he is a person with a serf-like mentality, then he would feel the inadequacy of command with a Ningal, and a very powerful command with a Nee.

The above mentioned issue has a lot of associated affects on the functioning of the Kerala bureaucracy.

It may be mentioned that the different feudal languages of India has different codes, which may be unique to that specific language. The reality of the current situation is that the persons who write the text of the Indian laws and statutory rules are most ignorant of all these things. For these things do not appear in their nonsensical-content sociology and psychology textbooks.