A sample Gandhi

To make this point a bit more clear, let me tell about a politician I saw in a remote village in Kerala. Here even though the average intellectual  bearing of a person may be intrinsically abysmally low, no one is aware of it. For many of them work as peons, drivers, clerks etc. in the middle east and come home with a tidy pile of money, that the swindle known as currency exchange rate garners up for them. That is a peon over there, with a monthly earnings of around 2000 comes home with 27000 Indian rupees. While a local hard working man earning around 8000 per month, cannot do any wizardry to multiply it.  The middle-east working drivers and peons are considered as cultural leaders of the local society. They set up schools, including English ones. The social culture they radiate as leaders is really of the satanic one, but no one knows that.  

In this remote village, there is a Communist party leader, Balan. He was a schoolteacher who taught in class one, some twenty-five years ago. His knowledge in English is more or less nil. He addresses the vast majority of his communist party followers with a Nee, and uses the degrading words Avan, Aval, Avattakal etc. about them. As they are thus degraded, they show him reverence. They call him Balan Master. Now, it is the word Master that makes this man great. Once, I just mentioned him as Mr. Balan. The shock, grief and agitation that was seen on the face of his followers was phenomenal.  It was just like the defrocking of Gandhi. Mr. Balan was a denuded apparition, while Balan Master was a divinity. The rays of his divine aura extends outward through the appropriate changes in the various other Malayalam words for He, His, Him, You, Yours etc.

Now, why I have mentioned this here is to stress the routes and roots of command structure in Indian languages.  When Balan Master calls anyone of the persons he can address as Nee, it is literally a command, though cloaked in seemingly non-command language.  The person thus called treats him as a guru or some other such being. For him, whatever wrong and evil Balan Master does is nothing. At the same time, if the same misdemeanours or less are done by anyone who is not in the same code position as Balan Master, he or she is a miscreant, an antisocial and such.

Spreading the divine aura

When this man speaks of Balan Master in such revered terms to others, it can become a social standard as far as how others treat Balan Master. Actually this is a very cheap technique used by almost all persons in India. For example, think of a Jeep Taxi driver. In most Indian higher social areas, this person is treated as a socially lowly class. But then in the lower social areas, he can be a higher being, especially in small time villages, where the lower financial classes live. I have seen how they extend their social leadership. They have under them a group called the cleaners. These are persons who go in their jeeps, standing on the backdoor steps. They sort of manage the passengers who are sitting inside and collect the fare. Beyond that they act as a sort of serving class of the drivers. Among them, the taxi drivers are mini-gandhis. They address the driver with reverential words such as ji, chettan, annan. Now, there is a wider unwritten social duty given to them. It is their job to move around in their local social areas, and pronounce the words ji, chettan, annan etc appended to their drivers name and have such reverential titles made a social reality for their driver. Whenever the driver moves in such social areas where his reverence is thus accepted, he is a leader.

The magicians secrets exposed

In all ways of looking at it, this is also the secret of the hoax phenomena called Gandhiji.  To make the power of this devious method clear, let me mention the issue of Gandhis sexual misdemeanours in his ashram. It may be mentioned that sex is a weakness in many individuals and need not be taken as a measure of that mans other qualities. However, what needs to be mentioned here is if what Gandhi had done was done by anyone in a social atmosphere wherein he or she is not a divinity in the language code, it would have been dangerous.

What Gandhi did was not much, if taken from the perspective of a great mans doings. It was Unn, Adheham, Avar etc doing it. He had an unquenchable craving for young girls, and the story goes that he used to have at least two of the ashram girls to sleep with him. All of them would be in the nude and he would feel their body and they were to massage his naked body. His cravings could have come from his early sexual experience with his wife who was an adolescent girl at the time of his marriage. In a way, it could also point to his repulsion for his aged wife.

Inside the ashram, it was not a great issue, for in that social arena he was the great man, doing what he pleased. The language codes would not find anything funny about it. But in the outside world, especially among educated persons, who found in him a most cantankerous individual, his doings were of a misfits. Here he was just a Uss, a ayal, avan etc. Among them, his explanation that he was experimenting with his celibacy would not run.

In the first case, that of reverence, it would be He (adheham) is experimenting with his celibacy!

In the second case, it would be:  He (avan) and his nonsense experiments!  A cracking slap on his face is what he deserves!!

How it was done

How does one promote Gandhi? Well, it is the same way that the cleaners of the Jeep driver set to work. Gandhis followers who took the mantle of power after the formation of India, embedded Gandhiji into every school textbook. A separate philosophy called Gandhism was forced into creation, and a hallowed reverence was enforced. However, if one may look at the issue from a larger perspective, the same would have happened if the communist party had come to power in Indian national government. Many of their small time state leaders would have risen to international heights as epitomes of grand personal qualities.

The divinity and the buffoons

Now, it may be mentioned that this is the way all social communication moves in feudal language social systems.  If one sees Indian films also, this feudal arrangement of personalities can be seen.  That of one person who is the centrepiece and a lot of others in various levels of existences. Many of them are simply there to enact a sort of buffoonery to ennoble the main character.

Power in the command codes

Now, just take this issue to persons from such feudal language nations being allowed domicile in English nations. They exist there as beachheads for extra-national commands that have compelling powers. In fact, it is the cunning requirement of the leaders of feudal language nations to have their own language speaking people in English nation. It more or less gives them agents, deep inside opposite camps.  However as per English understandings they are not formal agents of anyone. But the moment a leader speaks to them from across the national borders, then the command lines fall into place. In such language codes there is no limit to what one can ask or demand of persons who come in the lower rungs of the hierarchy. And there is no means to ward off the command force, other than being downright impertinent and insulting. Not many mortals can do this. That is the power in oriental feudal languages.

Installing the Trojan horses

People of English nations currently do not have any understanding of all this. During the period of British colonialism, many of the English officials did come to see the devilish sides of Asian nations. And took heed to keep the negativity from encroaching into their social communication environment. However, now huge multinational corporations with no loyalty to any nation, other than their own global domination has more or less eroded the national boundaries of English nations and made them weak and vulnerable to powerful creepy codes, that can literally split, tear and atrophy the soft social life of English nations.

The deeper realities of International Relationship

Now when English nations try to evolve a theory of International Relationship, they do need to take this essential difference between themselves  and many other nations into account. Especially when it comes to dealing with Asian, African and South American nations.

The slimy treachery in the honouring

Oriental nations have something called superb hospitality. The guest is made to feel a divinity, and he is honoured to the hilt. In fact, the local languages do insist that the guest is equivalent to a divinity. Well, this may seem a wonderful stance. The reality is different and of a strange diabolic content.

The warmth of superb hospitality is not for every person who comes as a visitor. It is essentially meant for the person who is seen as a powerful personage, or at least someone who has to be extended temporary honour. The powerful personage naturally is entitled to this. For he is Adheham or Avar or Unn, all of the higher indicant levels. If he is of the Avan or Uss levels, naturally, there is no honoured reception for him.

In comparison to oriental hospitality, English reception  may seem quite cold. For the warmth that is extended in the orient is quite exuberant.  But then, there is an essential element of treachery in this warmth. For example, there is a saying in Southern Malayalam: To get one needs done, one may even need to bow to a donkey!

The philosophy is that if another person has attributes that one can make use of, then it is only being intelligent to extend him or her empty, premeditated honour. This honour extends till ones needs are satiated, and the next moment the honoured personage is removed of his frills and made to feel a non-entity.

Thus in orient, deceit is a natural element of cunning social interaction. Such attributes as honesty, courage of conviction, fair play, commitment, word of honour etc. has no meaning here, and are considered as stupid attributes, other than when they are to be extended to acknowledged superiors. The British official of the East India Company rule times were aware of this deep maliciousness of Indian social codes. However, the moment the reins of rule came to Britain, the wise guys over there thought that they knew better.  And literally made a messy understanding of British contribution to India.

Core elements of Human Equality

What I have spoken here are things that do not come under the stupid subject called International Relations.

Now let us look at the issue of Human equality. The Americans seems to put a lot of faith in this nonsense. Human beings are not intrinsically equal. Well, I am not talking from the point of colour and other such things, even though it is quite possible to say that a White man is not equal to a Black man. For quite obviously one is black and the other white.

Equality at the level that I am discussing here is entirely connected to the language under which this aspect of human being is discussed. Look at this example: Arent whites quite superior to the Asians? Well, this is a question that has many frill elements. For instance, of what white people are one discussing. For a Russian White is different from a British White. Whites from East Europe are quite different in many human features from those from West Europe.

It is my own contention that persons who have lived over the centuries in English nations have arrived at a higher human level of existence compared to others. However, in many ways, it may not have conferred superior attributes to them. For, English persons are really shackled by various levels of dignities, manners, honourable conduct, concepts of fair-play etc.  which all are not actually good in present day conditions, where cunning, shrewdness, treachery and such attributes are considered more powerful capacities.

Now look at this video: It is some English female having a confrontation with the South Kerala police. The issue is obvious, however that is not the point for discussion here. Look at the female constables who are trying to corner her. Who is superior? The White female or the South Kerala female constables?

Well, a quite honest answer might seem to be that the White female is superior.  Well, is it really true? Well, if the White female cannot understand the local language, that is Malayalam, then she can at least exist outside the inferiority that is being heaped on her. However, if she were a person who knows the local language, then the whole framework of equality and that of inferiority-superiority goes topsy-turvy. From the moment it is known that she can understand Malayalam, she becomes an Aval, Nee, Edi and such things that literally can take her right to the gutters below the level of the female constables. If she had been a White female who had lived under such abominable levels for long, her very features would reflect the gutter she carries on her soul and spirit. 

In other words, there is no such divine concept as of human equality and mutual dignity in Malayalam language. Now what should America the self-described imposer of human equality do here. Should the white woman be made equal to the female constables, or should the gutter-looking female constables be made to go back to their gutters? What I have written here is something no American foreign policy maker may know. Yet, many years ago, I did read a comment of Henry Kissinger when he was asked about the policy of apartheid in South Africa. He did seem to have a precious understanding that there was something essentially wrong about the Blacks over there, or at least in their social or communication system that may atrophy any good quality thing handed over to them.  I do not know anything more about Henry Kissinger.

Obamas demeanour

Now, what is all this to do with Barak Obama? Well, it depends. When I first saw his photo and a video of his speech, I was quite impressed. In many ways, he looked like a British Anglo-Saxon with a black paint on him. There was not a trace of a Black-from-Africa in him other than the skin-deep colour. It looked like a wonderful effect of British training on a Black man. In fact, most of the American Blacks do get this experience by just living in America.

I need to explain this aspect of America. America is a not something that literally fell from the skies. It was a nation that literally was a continuation of the immensity of British experiences, including technical, maritime, jurisprudence, martial, dressing, social communication and much else. All this came contained in the software called English.  The very fact that social communication would not split and hurtle men and women into various spaces in a four dimensional area by words and usages is due to the fact that it was English that  connected the persons.

Created in stupidity

America went in for a war for independence from Britain. In all ways of looking at this incident, one can only say that it was a war fomented by idiots. For if all the grievances that the Yankees had against their mother country were added up, it would come anywhere near to what most revolutionaries have against their suppressing regimes.  Is their grievances more than what a Kashmiri has against India, or what the Tamils had against Sri Lanka, or what the Moists have against the Indian armed forces.  In almost all ways, they were fighting against a nation which was known for civilised ways and manners, and not brutal torture and false encounters. Moreover, apart from such silly things attributed to stirring up passions like tax without representation etc., can it be compared to the sales tax issues of India, where the tax officials simply fleece the traders not only in their trading centres, but also on the highways?

If this tax issue could ignite so much rebellion, then a hundred rebellions should happen in India, where the people and traders are taxed to pay a fabulous pay and pension schemes for a minority of persons called the government employees. Yet, such things do not happen in India, for the regime can be brutal against anyone who thinks on these lines.

As to other aspect, look at the protections and reservations accorded to the native Red Indian population by the British government. This was one issue that really brought in acrimonious antipathy for the British. Well, Britain was the protector of human rights and not George Washington. In fact, there were many Red Indian tribes who fought on the British sides in this stupid war.

Then one needs to think of Obamas very obvious repulsion for Britain, as if he was making them atone for their crime of slavery. Well, he is being quite stupid, for during the days of Blacks slavery in the US, it was the proclamation of emancipation of Slaves in the British empire that gave the blacks a chance. They could now escape to Canada where the command of Queen Victoria of England held sway.  The blacks who reached the Canadian soil sang in her praise.

Language and quality

I had no idea that Obama was not really a black man, but only one with a skin-deep connection to Black antiquity. His mother was British, and that more or less accounted for his elegant English body language. For, it is sure that she had trained him in her ancestral social moods. Here again I need to stress that genes do not really matter. What matters is the quality of the language that encases a person.

Voodoo in the air

I have not studied Obama in any way. I see and read about him quite rarely. I understand that his father was a Kenyan. Maybe he knows the Kenyan language. He is said to have lived in Indonesia. Well, does he know the Indonesian language? Well, these are quite critical questions. For, feudal languages have powerful command links. If he knows any of these languages, and he is linked by these languages to any centre in either language, well then, it is equivalent to persons in those centres holding very powerful command strings on the American president. Well, the issue here is that native English speakers will not understand what I am talking about, and about its power. It is something quite in the world of witchcraft.  

The non-tangible, yet resilient Anglosphere

Now coming back to the issue of allies, there are traditional allies that English nations naturally have. For English nations essentially belong to a group called the Anglosphere. This is a natural alignment that comes about spontaneously. If the American presidents have forgotten this realm, then they have lost their basic understandings. Britains natural allies are Australia, Canada, New Zealand and off course the US of America. However, since the US is full of people who came from non-English nations and heaped loaded claims on their own heads as to what runs the US, they may not be in a mood to admit the British legacy in the US. Instead they would go around bragging variously about Italian contribution, Chinese genius, Japanese insights, Indian intelligence, French philosophies and much else. But not a word of the British social, administrative and intellectual designs would mentioned. Yet it is this single factor that makes the US great. In fact, this single factor in any nation can bring in total enlightenment in that section of the nation.

The contagious craving for leadership

Due to so much people who have barged into the America from feudal language nations, where there is a continuous aspiration for leadership, the US has developed an instinctive passion for leadership everywhere. Yet, it is like the Gandhian leadership. Even though Gandhi formally used the idea of non-violence as a political technique, all his followers were quite at home in stoning public offices, giving fire to property of their political enemies, haggling persons who did not acknowledge the spiritual glory of their leader and even in giving a physical battering to enemies, Gandhi simply had to look unconcerned and unperturbed by their actions. For, if he were to interfere in their rightful areas of political activity, he would be dethroned. It is a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship.

Allying with the demons

The same is the issue with America. It has made itself an ally of such nations as Korea, Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, South American nations, many African nations etc. All of them are satanic-to-the-core nations. In many of these nations, the common public has not much dignity when compared to the government officials. A common man going to the police station is a different experience from a government official going to a police station. How can America claim to be an ally of any of these nations. There would be segments of the population in these nations desperately trying to throw off the mantle of these crooks who rule them. When they take up arms, naturally the government would ask for American help, in logistics, munitions, technology, remote sensing etc. What moral right does an English nation have to help such demons?

These are the ruling groups which the colonial East Indian Company officials wouldnt have touched with a barge pole. What gives the Americans the right to think that they are doing a morally right job in collaborating with such repulsive groups, who keep a majority section of their populace at the **** level by the use of ****ifying language?

A sane foreign policy

A sane US foreign policy would be go in for a mood of political isolation from all such nations, and only allow relationships that are connected to trade. For allies, they should recreate the idea of the Anglosphere. In terms of political alliances, America should in very clear terms say that the level of people freedom in such nations as India and the rest of the nations are abominable and not condonable by American English standards. Feudal suppressive languages should be clearly defined as such and American repulsion for the same should be mentioned. Also American moral support to all populaces that are trying to throw off repressive regimes should be made clear. However, the US need not run to the aid of all such groups, for in most cases, the leadership of the rebels will also be encased in a similar feudal regimenting language structure. So that most rebellion ultimately only means the change of persons, and not a change of social living style and way of life.

However what I have said is easier said than done. For in almost all segments of American public life, people from feudal language nations have crept in. Even though they speak English in American accent, in the inner core of their mind there is another software running. That software is their native language. It can be terribly feudal, and does connect them incessantly with their native world, and its national leadership, where everything is uncannily different from the English mood.

Standardising American demeanour

I remember seeing a Discovery Channel programme sometime back. It was about the American military research wing making a very powerful weapon that could penetrate deep into inside the mountain cave and detonate from far inside; so that anyone hidden deep inside the caves could be pulverised by the tremendous air pressure build-up. A female scientist was speaking venomously about the need to kill the enemies. She was a Vietnam-native citizen of America. She spoke about the freedom that America had given her and her commitment to protect that freedom. Yet, the way she spoke was like a typical Asian with a feudal-language mind setting speaking of deemed ****-like enemies.  Well, it is good if she can make good weapons, but keep such persons from being the mouthpiece of American foreign policy, for what exudes out is not an English mood, but typical feudal language mental vibes. It can ignite equal belligerent passions in others, which a natural English mind will not.  America should radiate English vibes, and not the opposite tones.

Creating a new hallowed space

In a world where only a few languages and social systems have the freedom encrypted that are similar to that encoded in the English language, there is need to build up a citadel to protect that hallowed arena.  So the need of the hour is to set up an international group of nations that are English and only English. The natural leadership should go to the British monarch, as a formal focus of emotional attention. No other political entity, including the British House of Commons can replace it. Maybe the British monarchy needs pruning and shredding of frills, yet it contains within itself very powerful codes that has outlived the onslaught of centuries of political upheavals.

Lower to this formal entity, let there be a formal parliament of members from all the English nations.

What to dispense and what to filter out

It is time to dispense with the costly white elephant called the UN. It is a bleeding entity, that has given an immensity of wealth for officials from the third world  nations, and a chance for them to bask in international glory. Whatever good the UN can do can be done better by the English nations and the Red Cross. Support only organisations that are English nation based. Do not support English nation based organisations run by persons who are native to feudal language nations. Screen out persons who are English nation domiciled, but continues to use their own feudal native languages inside their households, and also have children who talk their native language. For feudal languages are not just communication software, but powerful command and compliance routes, that give lend strings to powerful extra-national command centres.

A monster about to run amok

To explain the tragedy of being associated with feudal language nations through an entity known as the UN, just see the situation of handing over the law and order of a beleaguered nation to a military contingent from any such nation as Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka etc.  These troops are not like English troops. The soldier is kept in a powerful level of shackles through powerful feudal usages. Though quite obsequious to their own officers, they are markedly discourteous to those they perceive as their inferiors. Well, when they are allowed the free run with weapons in their hands, they will lay their hands on any and all things that come their way. When the name of the UN is thus sullied, it can diffuse on to the name of English nations also, who are seen to be in charge of the UN. Yet, UN is not in anyones charge,  and it is going to be another international monster about to go berserk.

Sharing the same geographical location

Now we need to go back to the issue of differing hierarchical pyramids sharing the same geographical location.  Tamils couldnt bear to be subordinated to the Sri Lankan hierarchical pyramid.  Well, any sane man would understand that. Will British people love to live under Indian hierarchical pyramid? The answer is a categorical no. However, in the case of Tamil, it is also a feudal language, and not like English. But then, one cant force them to accept another mantle with a different command and position pattern.

Obama goes around speaking about how the US fought off the British mantle. Well, isnt he being either too stupid, or downright deceiving. For the British mantle over the New World was at best only a slender thing, while what the Tamils felt over them was something like a dragging blanket. Obama obviously thinks that the only legitimate freedom struggle in the world was the American War for Independence. It is a very silly understanding. Most of the people in the US, who brag about that war, including Obama, had anything to do with that war, in any way, including bloodline.

A mentally shackled president

When the Sri Lankans were carpet bombing the Tamil populace after keeping off all outsiders and independent media from that area, why didnt he order help to the dismally outgunned Tamils. Well, he was naturally deceived by some section of the Indian elite class domiciled in the US. They must have told him that the Tamils had assassinated Rajiv Gandhi, the former Prime Minister of India. Like everything that he seems to have got wrong, this piece of information was also wrong. Rajiv Gandhi is not to be defined as the former Prime Minister of India, but as the defeated or ousted prime minister of India.  He had become the prime minister on the sympathy wave that swept the nation when his mother was killed by her own security guards. Well, isnt it a silly claim to political power. Such as if Roland Regan had been killed, his son becoming the next president of the US, riding on the sympathy wave.

A conceited non-entity

Well, Rajiv Gandhi became a PM on a stupid reason. At the end of the five years, the nation was quite fed up of this silly man, who was by then reputed to have siphoned off around a 600 crores of Rupees as commission in a major arms deal. There was a major case against him and there were efforts to open up the Swiss Bank account where this money was deposited.

He who had no personal justification to become a PM of this nation sent the Indian army to crush the Tamil Tigers, with whom actually the Indian nation had no enmity with. His anger with them was possibly due to the fact that their leader Mr. Prabhakaran did not act like a servant to him, and demanded dignity of treatment. Mr. Prabhakaran who had been invited and brought to Delhi was held in house arrest and forced to sign a treaty. Mr. Prabhakaran went back to his command area, where he was a leader in his own right and repudiated what had been forced on him.

The Indian army was sent to hunt him down, and for the next two and a half years, they killed an immensity of Tamil freedom fighters and civilians. Since I was not a witness to what the Indian army did over there, I cant say for sure. However, there were a lot of stories about how they behaved when they raided Tamil houses.  Well, no one will be able to forgive the man who sent in the Indian armed forces to lay their hands on them. The experience can be terrifying, for it is ****-level personnel who are laying their hands on them. These armed forces personnel are kept at ****-level by their officers, in the feudal Hindi language. And when these same persons come into positions of domination, it is like making others also pieces of ****. No man, including an Englishman would be able to bear it, let alone the Tamils.

In the next election in India, Rajiv Gandhis party was faring badly. For in almost all places where the election took place before Rajivs death, his party lost. There was a desperate need to bring in something that could regenerate the partys chances. What else was better than an assassination? It has worked wonders in the past, and would so again in the future.

This was only one side of the logic that led to his killing. The other side is the simmering anger against him for sending a brutal force to lay their hands of Tamil populace. If he were to come to power again, surely he might send the Indian army again.

It is war. He had had the Tamils killed. What would the US had done if another nations leader was ordering the death of US civilians and manhandling of their private physical areas? If they were intelligent they would send an agent to kill him. If they were nuts, they would send in the US army to capture the land, and then go for a massive efforts to keep the nation running on their own expenses.

Rajiv was killed, allegedly by the LTTE commandoes. Yet, as in the case of Gandhi murder, there is need to think about who ultimately bore the benefits of this murder. Well, it was the Congress Party that got the full benefits. Well, any intelligent man would do some thinking on this basis. As for the LTTE, it was a stupid gesture, to kill him in such a manner that they naturally became the prime suspects. It was this single incident that was used to showcase them as terrorists. If they are terrorists for killing a man who had their tens of thousands killed with no particular motive, then what about India, which can also be held accountable for killing many persons. What is great about US jurisprudence that does not see any crime in Indian unilateral actions, in comparison to LTTE legal systems that stamp Rajiv as a mass murderer?

Who benefited in the Gandhi murder

In the case of Gandhi murder also, there was a terrible thing that was missed. The question of who benefited from Gandhis death. Gandhi was a sort of joke, and there were an immensity of slanderous stories abounding the Delhi newspapers, but not seen in out of Delhi newspapers; for his fetish for strange night time activities. Moreover, most of his outbursts were enjoyable when done from the safety of irresponsible positions. The whole of such cracking idiotism would amount to a madmans words when he starts mouthing the same from the position of responsible authority. He was a man better dead than alive. If alive a nuisance, but when killed a hallowed sainted person, whose special followers can ride high on the sympathy wave.

Well, this entity was then embedded into all the schoolbooks and a fabulous film based on a imaginative theme was made. The actor who featured Gandhi was a British actor. Every Indian was taught to revere him and through him his followers. It is this gigantic false story that has made the congress party survive to some extend. Otherwise, what is the scenario in India? Nehru used this legacy to the full. Nehru himself was a person who had an international reputation as a plagiarist. His most famous book The Glimpses of the World History is actually a clever content rewriting based on H G Wells An Outline History of the World. Well, it is a better book than H G Wells book, but then I have seen an immensity of such work being done in Delhi, where British and American books are handed over to local content developers who do a better job than the original.

The zombie rule in India

Now India is really under the rule of an Italian woman. She has kept a man who has the personality of a zombie as the Prime Minister. Indian presidents are persons who are assured to have low  quality personality and can never come to become powerful competitors to the Prime Minister. The current lady who occupies this post is an unknown entity and serves the needs of her Italian appointer very well. Her predecessor was a different experience. He may have been chosen for his atrocious facial expressions. However, in India there are more powerful things than looks and beauty and that is power and positions. This man was a professor. Naturally he is a Sar. A man who is a Sar is a powerful personality in whatever arena he  is allowed to move around. The moment he became the president, he started sending his vibes everywhere as a professor who had exploded the Indian nuclear bomb. Well, this claim was only false story, but no one really minded it; for it was an effective deterrent to the Pakis.

When his tenure was over, there was a bit of talk that he would be given an extension. But then, he had quite obviously overstepped his parameters. The current lady knows her position and is seen in photos as extending her ritualistic obeisance to the Italian usurper of the Indian sovereignty.

The nonchalance and the stupor

Obama stood still in a mood of supreme nonchalance when the Tamils were butchered. There is no confirmed and reliable reports of what really happened to Mr. Prabhakaran. His sons photo was shown as of an ugly man, whereas there were other photos available showing him as an elegant looking man. What happened to Mr. Prabhakarans wife and daughter? Mr. Prabhakarans body is shown as that of very cleanly dressed and well-shaven man. Is it possible to believe that this was the body of Mr. Prabhakaran? He was engaged in fighting with a enclosing, heavily armed enemy from a place that was the size of a football court for days. In the midst of all this, he had time to have a nice shave, wear well-ironed cloths and look quite well-fed? Surely there is some mystery.

A lot of war crimes were done by the Sri Lankan army. But what was American response to all this? They gave an American citizenship to the Sri Lankan General and his family. Is the US government going nuts? What kind of message is the US giving about itself to the world?  Obama claims his black antiquity in quite endearing terms. Well, then when black skinned people, the Tamils were being made into mincemeat, where had this endearment disappeared?

It only points to the level of outside infiltration that has happened to the inner core of American policymaking machinery.  

Protecting quality

Now let me take a quite different scenario. That of South Africa.  Here the issue could be that of a refined group of people who had brought in good customs, education, refinement in dressing and behaviour standards made subordinate to persons whose language could have ****ifying elements. I am not sure about it, but then if there is an element of what is can be called respect for certain persons encoded in the South African languages, then its very necessary compliment, that of disrespect or ****ification of other persons will also be there. If it is there, then the White section definitely needs protection from the black despoiling.

What I am saying here are things that do not currently appear in social science or language study or even in political science textbooks. Yet, they are real and of very powerful content. If these elements are there in South African Black languages and other communication systems, including gestures, then there is immediate need to create a separate homeland for the Whites there. It is not really a case of Blacks verses the Whites, but that of a refinement creating communication systems interacting with ****ifying communication system. The first one can bring in refinement, while the other can despoil. The first will naturally try to segregate themselves from the other. Hence the apartheid.

But then will Obama have the necessary inner strength to look straight at the issue mentioned? Or will he encumbered by his black skin and find it a holy sin to say anything that may seem to disparage black legacies? It requires great courage to deal at this level of finer aspects of human conditioning.

Emphasising equality with the Indians

Now let us look at Obama coming to India and the Indian leader emphasising the point that Indians and the Americans are equal. Well, if they are equal, there wouldnt be any need to mention it. However when Obama also seems to sing the same parody, there comes in a need to think deep about the implications, and what is implied and not implied.

Before speaking about that let me state that when Obama came to India, the general talk was that America had no money and that he was coming with a begging bowl. In oriental feudal language codes, the bigger man does not go to others, instead wait for the other side to this side with their requests or demands. In a way, this is one major constraint to speedy actions.

America is financially down, and they are now equal to the Indians! Well, no English speaking person will understand the full implications of this dialogue. For, then there is tumbling down of indicant words of respect, and they can be replaced by crude, despoiling lesser level words. Not just the American nation, but also all men, women and children stand to get despoiled.  When that happens, they lose their safety. Englishmen of Robert Clives time did understand that in India safety of all possessions including personal life and that of ones women, were dependant on prestige. In India the person who has no prestige is literally vulnerable to all sorts of onslaughts.

Second, when Americans are claimed to be equal to the Indians, what does it really mean? Well, in India there is  no equality. The governing class, the superior politicians as well as the officialdom are the higher ups in the language codes. The rest of the people are in various levels of despoilment depending on their relative levels in language. Each person and each level is desperate to press down others and thus go up.

Is Obama aiming to equalise all Americans to this messy levels? For example, an Indian taxi-driver, agricultural worker, a private office clerk are all kept in various low levels by the governing class in the language. Does Obama aim to make all American agricultural workers, taxi-drivers, and office clerk to go down to this obnoxious level? Isnt he being terribly irresponsible in this actions?

Featuring greatness

What is this talk about India being a great power? A great power is what? When a lot of money from English nations seep into a nation due to some stupidity of the English nations, does a nation become a great nation? Well, a nation is great when the people of that nation acquire personal qualities that allow them to exist in quiet dignity. That India does not have.  As to the foreign money that has seeped in, the harsh reality is that it gives fabulous wealth to a few due to the heavy exchange rate difference. For example, a person in India who works hard earns around 8000 per month. A man who goes to the Middle east and works as a clerk gets around 2000 of that local currency. By exchanging it into Indian currency this man get around 27000 rupees. The local Indian man is literally smashed up.

If the other man is working in the US and earns, his 2000 turns into 100000 rupees. These foreign employed persons come to become commanding persons in Indian social scene and literally live as kings. They go into international business, and then try to emigrate to English nations. There is no betterment of the common Indian due to any of these actions. He or she remains a servant to these neo-colonists, who speaks the feudal suppressive language to them.  In this regard, they are a million times worse that the British colonists, who spoke to the Indians in English and thus aided in their mental and physical growth.  

When citizens of English nations are thus made equal to persons from feudal language nations, a withering of quality, caused by the lessening of values in their inner codes can happen. It may result in such effects as panic attacks, paranoia and also loss of intrinsic human value. This is an issue which requires a wider understanding and is of wider ramifications.

Islam and English

Now let us think of the issue of Islam and of Obama allowing a mosque near to Ground Zero.  The subject is quite deep and may need a deeper study than can be done in this write-up. However to try to make a brief discussion on this subject, this is what I would like to say:

Prophet Mohammed is a man who can in various ways be described as a man quite near to English social mood. Yet, he was living in a nation that was Asian and quite barbarian. There could be peculiarities in the language that gave such a design his nation. The communication structure could force fathers to bury their daughters live. There was no security for the solitary women, and raiding parties could make off with women who are in weak hands.

In the mosque in Medina when the Prophet came, people got up. But he hastened to tell them not to get up, as he was only a  man, and not a superior. The Islam that he gave as message spoke of universal brotherhood, and of equality among all human beings. Moreover, he was a very tolerant man, who was most forgiving.  In his lifestyle, he was not luxurious.

However, his followers who went forth to spread the message were not quite of this fibre. For Islam was soon get converted into the various feudal languages, and thus lost its essential message of human equality. For example, in Malayalam when persons get arrayed into superiors and inferiors as Avan, Ayaal, Adheham, Sar etc. how can Islam maintain its essential quality? Moreover, people gets split as Nee, Ningal, Thangal, Sar etc.

Well, most of the languages of the modern Muslims are actually haram languages for Islam. People who claim to be Islam but exist as Hindi Islam, Urdu Islam, Malayalam Islam, Tamil Islam, Chinese Islam, Afghan Islam etc.  are not really Islam. The social system that they create is not Islamic, but essentially one that is the very opposite of Islam.

When Obama gives permission for a mosque to be build in the nearby areas of Ground Zero, actually he is not allowing pristine Islam to arrive, but giving entry to organised feudal language leaderships. Currently it is not possible to differentiate Islam from the features of feudal language social set-ups. For it is weighed down by the strings of hierarchical structuring of leadership and followers, which actually stands as the very opposite of Islamic tenets.  

Asian feudal languages creates social mood that are intrusive, forbidding and judgemental of others. Current day Islam also carries many of these features, which are what Prophet Mohammed tried to erase from the barbarian social system where he was born in.

Now with democracy having run amok inside Great Britain, and an immensity of outsiders having encroached the inside premises of GB, collective intelligence could have links sparking out to outrageously unacceptable areas.