One may notice a lot of brutality and beastliness associated with violence in feudal language nations. This is mainly due to the negative placement a persons gets in the virtual arena as lower indicant words are addressed to him and about him. Moreover non-verbal symbols, signals and even actions can have negative indicant level meanings, when seen from the virtual code world. For, even a slight action of repulsion can get powerfully converted to abhorrent indicant word levels when decoded into software codes.
Many of the senseless violence currently seen in English nations can be directly attributed to the negative evilness that has come to pervade the inner codes of those nations through the uncontrolled swarming of feudal language social groups. They can cause distress not only among themselves, but also among the non-feudal language groups. For even un-understandable words and degrading signals can get detected for what they are from the virtual software levels. They can create terrible levels of animosity, for the distress they cause are terrifying, due to their inexplicable and perplexing nature.
The ****ification and the holyfication
Sometime back, there was an issue. One New Zealand TV commentator stressed on the word **** that was part of an Indian politicians name. It did create sharp words of recrimination from the Indian side. The comment was possibly in poor taste. However, what really provoked the TV commentator to go in for such a thing is not known to me.
I have brought in this theme to the fore here, because of the fact that a sort of ****ification is an essential part of Indian feudal language communication. When lower indicant words are used, a slight degrading happens. In other words, feudal languages do have a major component in them which are naturally pejorative in sense and effect.
However, the degrading effect of any specific word is not uniform. This has been mentioned earlier. When persons of equal social, age, position etc. levels use such lower indicant words to each other, it is a situation of endearment, friendship, equality and such. However, when one of the them is higher and the other is lower, so that the lower side has to use higher indicant words to the other, then it is an issue of degrading, snubbing, keeping position, intrusive freedom to one side over the other and such. Yet, there need not be ****ification per se. In this particular situation, ****ification happens only if the person/s moved to the lower side has certain higher sides to him/them. For example, a person from a socially highly valued family, a person with higher intellectual bearing, a teacher whom others treat as respected etc. is thus addressed in the pejorative, then there is ****ification.
But if the lower placed person is essentially from a lower mental and social pane, then there is not much of a ****ification other than pure placing in a lower position.
Yet, the essential elements of ****ification come when lower placed persons use pejoratives to higher placed persons. This higher placing can be socially, financially, intellectually, age-wise and such. The pejorative effect then can really be that of powerful ****ification. And if the thus attacked person has no proper protection by way of someone to rectify the situation, then he or she is perfectly defenceless to this sort of attack.
In the virtual code, the person is being perfectly being encoded with negative codes. It is like an unprotected computer into which viruses are entering with no firewall protection. The experience is terrible, with horrible connotations and possibilities.
It can lead to terrible violence in retaliation. But then, if the ****ifying side is something like the Indian police (low quality persons with great physical power), then many persons of quality simply commit suicide.
When viewing actions in English nations which are commonly termed racially motivated, there is an essential need to understand this issue. For, it may really be an action that is really spurred by pure motivation of self-defence. However, the spurring may be taking place at the virtual code arena, and thus not understandable or easily condonable from the material world. Yet, if this core issue is disregarded, refined English social systems may corrode.
The same issue may be taken up when studying the issues that spurred apartheid in South Africa. Beyond that, it may be understood that the same emotions caused untouchablity and caste based repulsiveness in India.
The repulsion could be towards the issue of being putrefied. Materially as well as in the virtual code arena.
The issue at hand is that feudal languages do carry an extreme form of negativity in that another person can put a measurement of any other person or entity. This measurement is extremely independent of what the other person or entity actually is.
The issues of censure and censors
Censuring, censoring, falsification and also premeditated hallowing are generally common features of a feudal language social system and nation. The issue here is of allowing another person to impress the public. It is a very dangerous thing and its various parameters has to be clearly understood before anyone can be allowed this advantage. This is the situation in a feudal language system. For example, a writer is allowed to showcase his writings, philosophies and thoughts. If by any chance he or she is able to impress anyone, it sure becomes a case of indicant word changing. Words for He or She, His or Hers and such change dramatically across the indicant word array. Moreover, when the indicant word levels improve, automatically powerful suffixes of respect come to perch on the persons name.
In such a scenario, the effect is that of allowing this person to create a leadership and a following among the people. The effect in feudal language nation is akin to having a military like command structure being created.
English nations would not understand why there are so many needs for censoring and controlling of the media, persons and opinions. The core issue is this.
Now, again I need to tell that in the virtual software code, when one is allowed to showcase ones positive attributes to others, a powerful running of numerical values is taking place in certain critical areas in the persons virtual software. Externally its ramifications can be seen through the rapid changes in the indicant words.
The fiscal difference between feudal language nations and planar language nations
I am not very sure about this, but my general impression is that feudal language nations necessarily try to create wealth by reducing their currency exchange value. It is a very diabolical method of achieving prosperity. For, the majority population moves into lower standards, economically as well as socially. An extremely minor percentage of the population who have earnings from abroad grow up astronomically in financial terms. This minor group generally get to dominate the media and government. They radiate extremely prosperous looks, physical well-being, intelligence and capacities. Yet, the total reality of the nation is quite opposite.
The lower classes exhibit extremely lower quality demeanour. This is explained away by the dominant class as being caused by centuries of exploitation by colonialism, by multinational companies, by capitalistic nations etc. Yet, the vibrant truth would be that the lower quality demeanour is directly caused by the suppressive use of lower indicant words on the majority population by the dominant classes. If this majority section of the population is removed from the sting of the lower indicant words and usages, the lower quality demeanour would vanish and a superior, softer demeanour would come about.
Virtual codes and sex
Sex can be a very powerful work of virtual software. There may be much to be understood in the total dimension of this powerful phenomenon. It is directly connected to creating new life, by the amalgamation of inputs from two different life software. Well, I am not in a position to say what all things it does encompass.
Yet, I do feel that sex in its minimum form is directly connected to such things as leadership, firmness of hierarchical strings, feelings of self confidence, moral support, physical support, morale and such. For example, a failed attempt at sex with ones life partner may have severe recuperations on a persons other activities, especially if they do require mental stamina, composure and physical stability. If the wife consistently thwarts any endeavour by the husband to have a vibrant sex with her, then it is a failed husband who is getting for his worldly efforts in the morning.
At the same time, if it is a delightful sex that has enthused, then the person come out with a rare daring to face the world. These are not simple psychological feeling without any material support. For, all these happenings of sexual failure and success get encoded into ones life software with numerical values.
Now what about adultery? Well, in feudal languages, if one is able to seduce another mans wife and have sex with her, it is equivalent to robbing that husbands positive numerical inputs and assimilating them into ones own life software. A sort of diabolic power surge can happen. In other words, a feeling of leadership, over self-confidence etc. can come about. As to the wife who has allowed another person to trespass into what is her husbands rightful domain, she is standing in the position of a traitor inside.
Yet, there are other limiting factors, such as moral values, negative conscience and such, which might play spoilsport, to the total effect.
As to how this issue works out in an English setting need to be studied with inputs from many frill elements.
The power of observation or visual input
Does mere seeing a thing change its features, attributes and future? Well, in the total of the writings in this book, I have mentioned the theme of seeing many times, and the way it does change the indicant word levels.
I open a page in my computer containing a lot of passwords and usernames. A casual observer happens to go through them. Does it mean anything to me and to him/her? Well, it depends on the observer. To a person who is totally unconnected to the things that are locked up inside the username password combination, it means nothing. However, to a person who is aware of the various things that I have made password access, it may mean a glorious input. It may literally mean the opening up and access to many things that I have made un-see-able to others.
In fact, the very seeing of the password page of mine has made changes in its status. Moreover both the observer as well as I has been affected.
Take another example: A young Indian-feudal language-speaking female (age 27), who is a senior officer in the Indian bureaucracy, that is an IAS officer, is having bath in a bathroom. Her senior aged peon (age 42) gets the opportunity to watch her bathe through a hole in the wall. What happens to her? Has she lost anything? In material terms, she has not lost anything. Yet, her body features have become encoded into the peons mind. Does it affect her in any ways? Well, for one thing, her female body devoid of clothing can in a grave manner reduce her to the levels of a young dismal, in the mind of the peon. The indicant level of a young girl is much lower than that of the senior bureaucrat.
The fact is that even such things as a camera can bring in changes into the material world, even though there is no way the person and entities in the scene can detect the camera. The affect it brings about depends on who is viewing the scene send by the camera. Beyond that, they can even edit and make other changes in the images and videos they have received.
Now, what I am contending here is that even the mere looking at a person by another can affect both of them. How, it depends. Now, the issue here is that if the social set up is feudal language, then the indicant level of the persons involved can have grave bearing on the total effect.
If a very lower indicant level person is able to view a superior indicant person, it does have its affects in a feudal language situation. For, the lower indicant person can look at the other person from a variety of angles and perspectives. He can look at the superior level person from a perspective of derision. In which case, the very manner in which the eyes are cast on the superior person can be of destabilising effect on the total personality of the superior person. Here, I must mention that the description superior is a relative word. It can mean superior in civility, politeness, knowledge and learning, social elevation and such. It need not necessarily mean superiority in wealth alone.
It is like a very low caste person viewing the young wife of his feudal lord. If the viewing is devoid of standard affectations of respect, then it can easily go into the levels of atrophying lechery, or of putrefying disrespect. The lower the lower caste person is, the more is the negative effect. In the virtual code arena, the young wife of the feudal landlord is being sent into abominable levels, from where her features and attributes can be subjected to more gruesome virtual code editing.
In many ways, the so-called reluctance to allow lower caste persons into the social and familial ambience of higher castes can be connected to this. Again, the culprit here is the feudal language codes that pour in colossal negativity in the virtual codes of certain sections of the population.
Now, I should go into another arena inside the virtual code. Visual inputs are basically codes. They do affect other codes. What about touching? Well, there is a code input for the person who does the touching as well as for the person who is being touched. Both get different kinds of code inputs, but then they are of a complimentary nature. The emotions they produce in each of the persons depend on many things. Yet, a link has been established. If the person who has been touched loves the feelings, then it has an added effect. If the person who has touched loves the feeling, it is a complimentary effect, and there can be a powerful link established.
It is a similar situation with visual inputs. A beautiful young woman is being observed by a man. He gets visual inputs. The woman also gets some inputs of being observed. Well, a link has been established. The man loves the inputs he gets. The woman loves the inputs that she gets. Well, a relationship in the virtual code has been established.
Now, the real effect is how the different brain software processes the inputs. In feudal language software, the processing is quite powerful, for there is an array of positions to fit the inputs.
Now, if the woman is an employee of the observing man, then the visual codes that enter the observing person has a dominated mood. In the case of the woman, her brain may detect a powerful editing being done to her, by means of the powerful lower indicant word position that has been assigned to her and her visual inputs.
In every way, the codes of visual inputs are similar to touch inputs. The feelings are similar, and the emotional tie up could also be similar, if allowed. Even if not allowed, a link has been created. Even in English systems.
In many ways, this stands as a reason why in certain societies men do not want their women to be viewed by other men. For, there is an affect that the ordinary native English speaker cannot understand. It can be nullified, by making the experience a commonplace incident.
What is in a name?
Do names have certain powers? Well, it depends on the language. In English also, it may have certain aspects which are significant. For, names are basically words. Words do have power, depth, sound, tone, links and possibly weight. Since each alphabet in the name does have codes behind them, there is possibly some kind of connection with names and their effect. However, it can depend on the context, person, persons and many other things.
In English Mr., Mrs., Miss and such prefixes have certain codes in them, that do some sort of cordoning. However, there is no need for suffixes in English. However, I have noticed suffixes to be important in feudal languages. Words such as Ji, mash (master), chettan, annan, checchi, sar and such words are used as suffixes. They are quite significant in what they achieve in the social context. An absence of such suffixes can be of terrible effect. For example, if the highly respected Balan Mash is converted into a mere Balan or to a Mr. Balan, the person is sort of totally denuded of divine attributes that had been conveyed by the Mash.
In a similar manner, the very saying Gandhi or Mr. Gandhi, instead of Gandhiji can toss Gandhi down the depths in an Indian feudal language. For example, if anyone goes around mentioning Gandhi instead of Gandhiji in Malayalam, he would be frowned upon, and seen as an impertinent upstart who would need to be put down violently. For, a mere Gandhi is a mere individual with all sort of human weaknesses. Whereas Gandhiji is a superhuman, whose vagaries are not weaknesses, but sort of divine explorations.
Why do feudal languages need suffixes, while English does not? Well, the answer may lies deep inside the codes of indicant word content. It is like the insisting in Fengu Shi that one can derive powers by merely positioning oneself behind big walls, huge trees, towering mountains and such. I am not sure if this is effective in English. However it is a very effective thing in feudal languages. Fengu Shi is connected to the Chinese language. In such a software, where persons may tumble down a gorge if without a proper prop, a backing is always necessary. This is more or less evident in the insistence that a backing wall, a tree, a mountain or some such thing is needed to prop up the leader, the guru, the saint and such.
The reader may have noticed almost all feudal language saints, gurus and such persons, almost invariably seen to be sitting in front of disciples with something like a tree, a wall, a mountain etc. in the background.
How does this help the guru acquire some powers of leadership or make him the focus of his disciples? Well, the answer may lie in the codes of the language or maybe in the codes of reality.
Removing the suffixes of respect from a persons name in Malayalam would be equal to removing the tree from the background of guru as he is teaching his disciples. In the former case, the person literally can tumble down the indicant word array.
Beyond all this, what are actually names? Are they some sort of file names in the virtual code software? Can a changing of name create any change in anything? For example, when Bombay was renamed as Mumbai, did anything substantial change in the attributes of city? Was Bombay different from Mumbai? Or did Bombay change so substantially that the change of name was a natural outcome of the issue that the changed version of the city could no longer be contained in the word Bombay?
Well, it is possible that names do have some defining attributes. And at the very least, if it is a sort of file name in the virtual software, a change of name can disconnect many routes to the insides of the file. When Bombay was renamed, in many ways, its ancient connections to so many historical incidences were affected. Well, the links could still be maintained, but only with the additions of some more link routes. So that when the path is followed, a link from Bombay to Mumbai had to be written.
A simple change of name is not quite a simple thing. It does disconnect persons and entities from many incidences and events, and descriptions.
Codes of laughter
I have tried to observe certain persons erasing negative inputs, that could have disturbed or distressed them. Basically, the technique is to overwrite negative inputs with some positive inputs or by some other powerful means. One of the techniques that I have seen is the use of laughter, in its many forms. It can be derisive, wherein the bringer of bad inputs is belittled. Or it can be a laugh that belittles the negative idea. In short, laughter acts as some code input that can sort of select the negativity and sort of delete, quarantine or neutralise it.
Laughter is something that has definite connection to the quality of the language. For example, the more feudal type the language is, the more powerful is the derisive and destructive effect. For example, in terribly feudal languages like Tamil the effect is more powerful. For, it can literally move the targeted person/s defencelessly across the indicant word spectrum, to their doom. It may be observed that the power of mocking, even through literature, is very intense in languages that have feudal content. This can be understood even when comparatively feudal languages like French is compared with English. Being made fun of can be a very terrible provocation in such languages, for it can send the targeted individuals tumbling down the indicant word array. Especially if the fun making is done on the higher ups by the lower guys. The effect can be quite provocative. I think this was a technique which persons like Voltaire used to the hilt. However, in languages like English, even though it can be distressing, the huge quantum of provocation that it can cause is comparatively less. For, nothing much changes in the indicant word array.
